On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:26:42PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > The libosinfo bug tracker seems to be entirely ignored, doesn't look like any > bug that's ever been filed has had a response: > > https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/report/8 > > There's at least 3 patches in there as well. > > I assume this is mostly due to trac being really easy to ignore, and default > assignee + cc list not setup. How do people feel about moving the bug tracker > to bugzilla.redhat.com product=Virtualization Tools, which is what libvirt*, > libguestfs, and virt-manager use. > > If so the process would be: > > - request the component with bugzilla-requests@xxxxxxxxxx. they will need > default assignee and cc list at least. > - change libosinfo.org to point to the bugzilla instance rather than trac > - once that's done, transfer over all the trac bugs, though I suspect many of > them are obsolete. > - send a request to fedora infrastructure to disable the trac bug tracker for > https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/ (in fact, they can probably disable > this page entirely, it's redundant since there's already libosinfo.org) > > Thoughts? If there is not much traffic on trac, we could also add that list to the default CC: list of new bugs. bugzilla.redhat.com is also fine with me. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpPz1A7DYNYH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
