On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:26:42PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> The libosinfo bug tracker seems to be entirely ignored, doesn't look like any >> bug that's ever been filed has had a response: >> >> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/report/8 >> >> There's at least 3 patches in there as well. >> >> I assume this is mostly due to trac being really easy to ignore, and default >> assignee + cc list not setup. How do people feel about moving the bug tracker >> to bugzilla.redhat.com product=Virtualization Tools, which is what libvirt*, >> libguestfs, and virt-manager use. >> >> If so the process would be: >> >> - request the component with bugzilla-requests@xxxxxxxxxx. they will need >> default assignee and cc list at least. >> - change libosinfo.org to point to the bugzilla instance rather than trac >> - once that's done, transfer over all the trac bugs, though I suspect many of >> them are obsolete. >> - send a request to fedora infrastructure to disable the trac bug tracker for >> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/ (in fact, they can probably disable >> this page entirely, it's redundant since there's already libosinfo.org) >> >> Thoughts? > > If there is not much traffic on trac, we could also add that list to the > default CC: list of new bugs. bugzilla.redhat.com is also fine with me. Never really liked trac so moving to bugzilla would be nice. Talking of which, I never understood why libosinfo lives on fedorahosted. Could we maybe move it to libvirt, freedesktop.org, gitorious or any other non-distro-specific infra? Any thoughts on this? -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
