Re: Anyone watching the fedorahosted bug tracker?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/17/2014 07:57 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:26:42PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>> The libosinfo bug tracker seems to be entirely ignored, doesn't look like any
>>> bug that's ever been filed has had a response:
>>>
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/report/8
>>>
>>> There's at least 3 patches in there as well.
>>>
>>> I assume this is mostly due to trac being really easy to ignore, and default
>>> assignee + cc list not setup. How do people feel about moving the bug tracker
>>> to bugzilla.redhat.com product=Virtualization Tools, which is what libvirt*,
>>> libguestfs, and virt-manager use.
>>>
>>> If so the process would be:
>>>
>>> - request the component with bugzilla-requests@xxxxxxxxxx. they will need
>>> default assignee and cc list at least.
>>> - change libosinfo.org to point to the bugzilla instance rather than trac
>>> - once that's done, transfer over all the trac bugs, though I suspect many of
>>> them are obsolete.
>>> - send a request to fedora infrastructure to disable the trac bug tracker for
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/libosinfo/    (in fact, they can probably disable
>>> this page entirely, it's redundant since there's already libosinfo.org)
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> If there is not much traffic on trac, we could also add that list to the
>> default CC: list of new bugs. bugzilla.redhat.com is also fine with me.
> 
> Never really liked trac so moving to bugzilla would be nice.
> 
> Talking of which, I never understood why libosinfo lives on
> fedorahosted. Could we maybe move it to libvirt, freedesktop.org,
> gitorious or any other non-distro-specific infra? Any thoughts on
> this?
> 

libvirt.org would be a bit strange since libosinfo isn't libvirt specific, and
ideally long term other projects like say cobbler would pick up libosinfo so
it may not even be virt specific.

gitorious could work, but then if no one watches for pull requests it's just
another place where contributions could be lost.

freedesktop would be cool, though no idea what the criteria is for getting a
project hosted there.

- Cole

_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux