> >> I still think you can solve the NAT problem by making the NAT box a > >> certmaster and using a proxy, but we need to do configurable ports > >> anyway (just because hardcoding is bad), so I think that's reasonable. > > > > Yes it could be a solution but it's not always possible. Sometimes > > router is just a stupid box running some embedded OS and sometimes you > > just can't or don't want to install anything on it.. > > Right, I'm not disagreeing. Most interest in Func is going to come from > datacenters/labs/grids/etc, where this won't need to exist. > If you are using it for "do something to my home machine" then it could > be useful. It's still easy enough to add so I don't see a reason for not > doing it for the home-setup with two servers behind a Linksys box case. ++ I believe in that "from the beginning",it was actually the first idea that came to my mind about adding something to func. It maybe because i'm behind NAT :) _______________________________________________ Func-list mailing list Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
