Re: More proposed get.fpo adjustments, based on user feedback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 06:18:45PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 06:16 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > I'm not sure it's a good idea for the official Fedora website to take
> > up maintenance of an OEM listing.  That's better done on the wiki,
> > where it's easier for the community to update.
> >   
> 
> The official website does include the wiki.  If you mean static html
> pages, a pointer in the appropriate place could guide users to the wiki
> with the listing

I used the word "official" incorrectly.  But yes, we're agreed -- a
link to the wiki with the listing is what I was suggesting, as opposed
to trying to maintain a very fungible listing in the hosted fedora-web
module.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
          Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
-- 
websites mailing list
websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux