Re: More proposed get.fpo adjustments, based on user feedback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 10:10 AM, Sijis Aviles wrote:
>> I'm all for this. I think the changes are great.
>> +1
>>
>> A quick thought about that architecture tab would be replacing it with an advanced tab, which would include the stuff in get-fedora-all. We can discuss this further.
>>
>> One question - what would we do about the older releases?
>>
>
> It appears we don't link to the following still:
>
> * Net installation
> * CD set installation
> * Jidgo files
> * boot.fp.o
>
> Rahu
>

Rahu -

These patches are suppose to address those issues.

Sijis
-- 
websites mailing list
websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux