Re: More proposed get.fpo adjustments, based on user feedback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/27/2010 10:10 AM, Sijis Aviles wrote:
> I'm all for this. I think the changes are great.
> +1
>
> A quick thought about that architecture tab would be replacing it with an advanced tab, which would include the stuff in get-fedora-all. We can discuss this further.
>
> One question - what would we do about the older releases?
>   

It appears we don't link to the following still:

* Net installation
* CD set installation
* Jidgo files
* boot.fp.o

Rahu
-- 
websites mailing list
websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux