On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:45 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > Which bugzilla component should receive bugs for formal Fedora websites? > > FDP created the 'fedora-websites' component in response to a need to > receive and channel such bugs. > > However, the Fedora Infrastructure group already existed. Should that > have the component that receives website bug traffic? Thanks for bringing this to the list where it belonged... I pinged Karsten in a Bugzilla entry earlier today about this issue. My feeling is that we don't want to make it harder for users to tell us about website problems, but we also want to help them put bugs in the right place when possible. > My main desire is to reduce confusion.[1] We've had some good > beginnings using the FDP-based component, but I'm happy to move our > group of bug responders over to the FI-based component. > [1] Speaking of which, anyone know how to remove or deprecate the > 'fedora-docs' component in the 'Fedora Core' category? I cc'd this to Dan Williams because I think I remember somebody saying he was the King of All Bugzilla. Certainly that odd component needs to vanish now that we have our own product category. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
