On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 01:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > We currently maintain several task lists and agenda times within the > wiki. This however seems a job thats better done by some sort of a web > based task list manager that allows you to set milestones, status, owner > etc. Anyone have ideas on what would be more efficient? Although normally, I'm in favor of improving tools, I try to pay attention when I get internal warnings such as these: * If it ain't broke, don't fix it. * If it's easy enough as-is, don't make it more complex without an extremely clear benefit. These jumped to my stomach immediately, so here is the benefit of my instinct on the matter. The project manager in me says that this is pretty far down the list of infrastructure work that needs to be done. We have at least a dozen projects that have minimal functionality I'd like to see improved before I'd like to see YAWeb-based project management tool. _If_ we were to roll out a larger project management infrastructure to manage the whole project, and were to roll up all project committee's task lists into it, that would possible be worth it. But only if we had some people who were committed to using the PM software in a proper fashion. I'm not interested in more tools that won't be used. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Content Services Fedora Documentation Project http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
