On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 12:34 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:45 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > > Which bugzilla component should receive bugs for formal Fedora websites? > > > > FDP created the 'fedora-websites' component in response to a need to > > receive and channel such bugs. > > > > However, the Fedora Infrastructure group already existed. Should that > > have the component that receives website bug traffic? > > Thanks for bringing this to the list where it belonged... I pinged > Karsten in a Bugzilla entry earlier today about this issue. My feeling > is that we don't want to make it harder for users to tell us about > website problems, but we also want to help them put bugs in the right > place when possible. > > > My main desire is to reduce confusion.[1] We've had some good > > beginnings using the FDP-based component, but I'm happy to move our > > group of bug responders over to the FI-based component. > > [1] Speaking of which, anyone know how to remove or deprecate the > > 'fedora-docs' component in the 'Fedora Core' category? > > I cc'd this to Dan Williams because I think I remember somebody saying > he was the King of All Bugzilla. Certainly that odd component needs to > vanish now that we have our own product category. not dcbw dkl == bugzilla master. Dave Lawrence -sv
