On 4/20/22 08:04, Petr Menšík wrote:
Could repeated flames around systemd mean something is wrong with the way systemd introduces new features? If people complain often, maybe those changes should have been made in opt-in mode. Especially on upgrades from previous releases. The mentioned change were invasive and has broken multiple scenarios. Could perhaps systemd team invest more time to propagating their features and persuading people to start using (and wanting) new features, instead of just throwing them at people?
The benefits have been well explained. The problem is that some people really don't like change even if it's for the better. And sometimes things do break when changed and instead of finding out why it breaks and how to fix, they just say how terrible the new software is and that it should never have been used.
The switch to systemd was a huge improvement and all the major distros and probably most of the rest have switched to it.
systemd-resolved is working fine for most people. I had to check if I'm using it because I hadn't even noticed any change. It will likely be extra useful for VPNs once I get around to setting up split DNS for that.
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
