On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 07:47:28PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > This looks like an appeal to authority, and not an argument on its > own merits. > > But let's go back and revisit all of that, if you insist. This is quite missing my point. I'm not interested in _arguing_ at all. The point is: your hyperbole about "hijacking" and etc. is not appropriate. This is an intentional, discussed, and approved change that went through the proper processes. It's fine for you to discuss the technical aspects — and even the "merits", as you said. But if that's what you want to do, do that. Several years ago, all of the vitriol and trolling on this list got so bad we had to shut down pretty much every systemd discussion. Let's not go back to that. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
