On 9/9/21 10:21 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
On 9 Sep 2021 at 19:16, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Is there a reason you can't use the Fedora kernel? That would give you
full secure boot support. What different options are you using for your
kernel?
I have done a test.
I can boot from the Fedora 34 live cd I have setup in
Virtual box. 2G boot file.
I've found that there are 23 packages that are not
included in the live cd setup, so have to install them.
[snip]
So, going from a simple boot with a 10M kernel and 30M
filesystem running in ram versus booting to a 2G
filesystem and having to add stuff requiring the internet.
I don't think you're getting my point and aren't actually answering my
questions.
What is special about the kernel you're compiling that the Fedora kernel
won't work? Don't say anything about EFI.
You have an initramfs already. Why can't you keep that, but replace the
kernel modules with the ones from Fedora?
This would get you a fully functional EFI boot that would even work with
secure boot enabled.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
