On 9/9/21 12:22 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
I don't want to create a UEFI Secure boot, since I have no way to pay for the expensive process of getting an official signature for the kernels I build from kernel.org source code. Kernels are about 10M in size, and the ramdisk.lzma is about 30M with supporting file system that then runs in Ram. In contrast the Fedora live Image is about 2G in size, and doesn't include a number of packages that are needed for the disk imaging.
Is there a reason you can't use the Fedora kernel? That would give you full secure boot support. What different options are you using for your kernel?
Have you looked at a Fedora bootable flash drive to see where the files are? _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
