On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 08:46 -0300, George N. White III wrote: > One of the motivations for Wayland was that the X.Org was becoming > unmaintainable and suffered from design choices that are no longer > relevant. Is it really unmaintainable, or is it that programmers just cannot be arsed to learn how to maintain someone else's code? And how does one person determine that some features are no-longer needed? It's quite clear that in several years of Wayland being around that various features needed by people using X have yet to be implemented. This whole idea of "I can't work on this, let's throw it all out and start again" is just incompetence. And you'll find several OS projects that have spent many years, repeatedly going through that process and never actually coming to any fruition because of it. Don't let those people near the kernel code. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Aug 25 17:23:54 UTC 2020 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list. _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
