Re: Fedora Present and Future: a Fedora.next 2014 Update (Part I,?“Why?”)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Powell, Michael wrote:
It doesn`t give you choices.  It leaves you in the dark about that it is somehow
possible to use an non-gui installer and to do a minimal install.  It leaves you
in the dark about what exactly happens when you do the partitioning and
with trying to figure out how get the partitioning you want.

As I said before, the entire installer was rebuilt to promote a more laid back approach. The user can choose the order they wish to customize / experience the GUI installation instead of being forced down a specific path. There might be a couple mandatories, but for the most part it's all about choice.

A non-gui installation is not something that the majority of users will choose so it's not apparent, but if you want that method, here you go:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Installation_Guide/ch-guimode-x86.html#idm219166212128

Thank you, I'll look at this. It's also possible some of the issues mentioned come from installing off a live CD instead of an install disk. I'm assuming that what "life disk" meant...

Partitioning took me about three hours with the installer of F19, with a very
simple setup and not even data to preserve and neither RAID, nor
encryption, and it was only possible after I created the partitions outside the
installer.  There was no way to do it with the installer, it kept saying there
isn`t enough room despite there was plenty, and it did what it wanted rather
than what I wanted.

It was seriously awful.  It would have taken 10--15 minutes with the Debian
installer.

I definitely think the usability of the partitioning scheme in the current installer needs work, but as I stated earlier, I think some people are just griping about the change instead of there actually being an issue; although, it does sounds like you actually had an issue with it not detecting the correct size / free space of your drives. You might want to submit a defect, because in comparison, I have a multi-drive setup with LUKs encryption and I can have both drives wiped and start all over with encryption in less than a minute or if I want to retain one disk scheme but clobber the other it takes about 3 minutes.

On this we agree, it needs a manual partition mode which really does just that, allows the user to create and remove partitions, share partitions between release versions installed, etc. The "old installer" wasn't perfect at this, I have booted live {CD,USB} and partitioned the drives manually, as mentioned above, but that was some really complex layout. I don't consider sharing /home and SWAP between two bootable releases to be so complex it must be done in rc.local.


The computer industry knows that more and more people want installations to be less scary and faster. This trend has been seen in the evolution of the Windows installer, MacOS, most Linux distros, and even iOS or Android. There are going to be some Linux distros that don't embrace this, you mentioned Debian and I'm sure slackware and Arch won't either, but in the end it's all about attracting more users to the product. The choices are there, but us hardcore users just have to look more since we're the minority.

One of my issues with Fedora is that at times the "make it easier" flag is waved, and other times the marching song is "we are cutting edge." There really seems to be division in the policy, or an assumption that "choice" and "easy" are somehow mutually exclusive.

Easier install means a good default, and clear unambiguous ways to do complex configurations. Note, I don't suggest that "simple" or "easy" are requirements, but ways to see the raw hardware clearly and tell the OS how to utilize it seem to fit "unambiguous" perfectly.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
--
users mailing list
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org




[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [EPEL Devel]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux