On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 01:10 -0500, Claude Jones wrote: > On Tue January 16 2007 12:49 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > > Selinux=0 may completely evacuate all selinux code from the boot > > process. Then, on the other hand, it may not. > > Maybe you guys are thinking about this all wrong. Suppose that Selinux is > really a diversion. By forcing the question of mandatory access controls at > the kernel level, there's a team of specialists being trained who are > mastering in great depth, the detailed minutiae of how each daemon they > program for, functions at the lowest levels. The goal is to create the > specialist team that knows every hook, every detail, of low level operations > of all major sofware running in the OS. > > Maybe I'm smoking too many cigars... Maybe it's Beagle? <evil cackles> That damn thing is a mystery to everyone on this list. Yet, it's still alive! Go figure. Ric -- ================================================ My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say: "There are two Great Sins in the world... ..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity. Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad. Linux user# 44256 Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/ http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/oar http://www.wayward4now.net ================================================
