Re: How NSA access was built into Windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue January 16 2007 12:49 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> Selinux=0 may completely evacuate all selinux code from the boot
> process.  Then, on the other hand, it may not.

Maybe you guys are thinking about this all wrong. Suppose that Selinux is 
really a diversion. By forcing the question of mandatory access controls at 
the kernel level, there's a team of specialists being trained who are 
mastering in great depth, the detailed minutiae of how each daemon they 
program for, functions at the lowest levels. The goal is to create the 
specialist team that knows every hook, every detail, of low level operations 
of all major sofware running in the OS. 

Maybe I'm smoking too many cigars...
-- 
Claude Jones
Brunswick, MD, USA

[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux