On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 22:27 -0500, Ric Moore wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 01:10 -0500, Claude Jones wrote: > > On Tue January 16 2007 12:49 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > > > Selinux=0 may completely evacuate all selinux code from the boot > > > process. Then, on the other hand, it may not. > > > > Maybe you guys are thinking about this all wrong. Suppose that Selinux is > > really a diversion. By forcing the question of mandatory access controls at > > the kernel level, there's a team of specialists being trained who are > > mastering in great depth, the detailed minutiae of how each daemon they > > program for, functions at the lowest levels. The goal is to create the > > specialist team that knows every hook, every detail, of low level operations > > of all major sofware running in the OS. > > > > Maybe I'm smoking too many cigars... > > Maybe it's Beagle? <evil cackles> That damn thing is a mystery to > everyone on this list. Yet, it's still alive! Go figure. Ric ---- just in case it isn't obvious - the point of beagle is to provide a ready in-depth searchable index of all text that has passed your way, be it via e-mail, documents or web. It's ambitious, imperfect but a dfe (damn fine effort). Craig
