On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 20:12 -0400, Jim Cornette wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 19:29 -0700, jdow wrote: > >> From: "Craig White" <craigwhite@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >>> On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 09:54 -0500, Bill Polhemus wrote: > >>>> Joe Klemmer wrote: > >>>>> Linux became GPL licensed on, if I remember right, February 1002. > >>>>> > >>>> Wow! Over a thousand years ago! > >>>> > >>>> You'd think they'd have all the bugs worked out by now. > >>> ---- > >>> took them a long time to get the kinks out of bugzilla > >> You used past tense, Craig! Do you REALLY think Bugzilla is > >> much more than a bug in the bug reporting process? > > ---- > > hmmm... > > > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&component_text=&query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=MODIFIED&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&fixed_in_type=allwordssubstr&fixed_in=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&emailassigned_to1=1&emailreporter1=1&emailqa_contact1=1&emailcc1=1&emaillongdesc1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=jdow%40earthlink.net&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=exact&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= > > > > long link represents advanced query on bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla for: > > bug owner, reporter, QA contact, cc list member, commenter is > > jdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > none found > > > > are you suggesting that you have first hand knowledge regarding the > > efficacy of bugzilla.redhat.com because there is no evidence that you've > > been there or at least reported a bug, added your comments to a bug or > > simply monitored a bug report. > > > > I will report that I have reported bugs, added myself to bug reports and > > have found that the system performed as I would expect it to. Perhaps > > you've got something to contribute. Perhaps, you might want to step in > > and help fix something that you think is broken. Perhaps you might want > > to disprove the notion that I am getting that you are a embittered > > fountain of negativity. > > > > Craig > > > > > > The address used for bugzilla could be different than the address used > for this list. I use another address for bug reports. > > Anyway, I really responded to ask a question regarding finding > previously filed and resolved reports. > > How would one find a bug report filed for an xorg-x11 problem relating > to an 865G video? I wanted to extract the xorg.conf file from the > previous report. I neglected to grab the xorg.conf file earlier, which > would be simpler than querying bugzilla. > > I changed the query setup for jdow to my bug reporting address and it > only revealed 12 bugs that I commented on or submitted. For comparison, > the my bugs link on the bottom of the bugzilla report shows that I have > 7 bugs active. > > I anticipated that the xorg-x11 bug that was never consciously resolved > but accidentally resolved when the driver was revised to accommodate > i830 dual head and broke the i810 video cards would show up in that query. ---- are you talking about this one ? http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161242 you did use a different email address on that (netscape.com) Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
