Re: FC4 or FC5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Sean <seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:03:09 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:

> Now we are back to the RIPEM example where a separate work
> using only the published library interface to a GPL'd work
> was threatened with legal action.

Sorry, that assumes facts not in evidence. If you want to
use a GPL library you better be sure about the legal
ramifications.

> And once again, it has nothing to do with 'using' a work. It
> has to do with distributing what someone could imaginatively
> call a derived work.

Whatever, i'm assuming by this point you can figure out
what I mean by such a shorthand.

> And again, not using GPL'd works seems to be your favorite solution,
> which makes it odd that you claim to like the license.

What i'm telling you is that what you're saying is about as stupid
as someone saying that Microsoft is "claiming" money out of their
pockets. Nobody says such a stupid thing of course. They understand
that to use Microsoft software you have to AGREE to give them money.

To use GPL software you have to AGREE to use it. If you don't AGREE
then by all means don't, but stop fscking bitching about it. It's
about as stupid as bitching about Microsoft's licensing practices.

And for the record I do like the GPL license very much, but i'm not
so bold as to assume it is for everyone. Since you have such a problem
with it, it seems like the best advice to offer YOU. It's not course
of action I recommend to myself or even to most people.

Cheers,
Sean


Hi Sean!

Yes it is quite evident that you like the GPL as it is, from all of your post.
However, please do not recommend it to people who need hardware
drivers on Laptops (as an example) that do not exist because the GPL
Kernal Devs have decided to change Linux (future changes comming)
so that they will not function with anything but GPL drivers.

Suse Linux 10.1 is now distributed without any non-GPL drivers
where as in 10.0, many were included so that many Laptops and
ALL of their hardware (WIFI, Modems) worked.

I think that the frustration for many is that we were hoping that Linux
would really evolve into a platform that was a fully functional alternative
to Windows.  Some Distros were getting close.  Now it looks like it will
be a very, very, very..., long time before the dawn.... if ever....




-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux