Re: FC4 or FC5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 12:35, Craig White wrote:
> > 
> > There was a free software community before the GPL, and there
> > still is.  Don't pretend that everyone has ever agreed that
> > the GPL restrictions are a good idea - or that they ever will.
> ----
> RMS through various efforts and refinement of ideas with help from
> others 'defined' the form of the free software community as it exists
> today but there has always been a 'public domain' that pre-existed
> before RMS, etc.

He has tried to redefine the term 'free' to mean restricted
and certainly is the major force in the GPL community.  But
don't confuse that with open source in general.  Less
restricted licenses and projects using them continue with
their success and useful purpose.

> GPL is the assurance that the code never legally enters some companies
> proprietary packages. GPL means that an effort to 'embrace, extend and
> extinguish' can never occur (as long as we are on the Microsoft topic).

But, with less restricted code whatever the original authors
want to publish remains free and available regardless of what
anyone else does with it.  The only net result of the GPL
is a reduction in the available choices.  Someone can't add
a proprietary improvement and sell it for the incremental
difference.   Which means I don't have the option to buy that.

> I can appreciate that Les' big axe here is device drivers - he has made
> that clear enough over time because Linux packaging can never make use
> of proprietary device drivers for companies that cannot or will not
> release their drivers as open source. His supposition is that the GPL
> prevents them from doing so and it many cases, this is likely true.

That's just today's hot button.  The point is that there is a
lot of other code around, some of it available under terms
an end user might find attractive, and none of it can be
used as an improvement to any GPL'd component.

> Anyone who remembers the BSD TCP/IP code stack in Windows NT knows why
> some people prefer GPL license over BSD type licenses...it absolutely
> prevents the 'embrace, extend, extinguish' of donated code making its
> way into proprietary software.

Beg to differ here. Microsoft originally wrote their own code
and anyone who had to co-exist on a LAN with those early
products (like the win95 version that got the retry timer
backwards and increased the rate instead of backing off on
congested networks) should have been thrilled when they
got it right somewhere around win98se/win2k no matter where
they got the code.  Everyone benefits when a well tested,
secure code base is reused instead of starting from
scratch and re-inventing all the protocol incompatibilities
and security exploits that have already been solved in
free code.  As much as I dislike Microsoft's monopoly, I'd
prefer that they sensibly use as much correctly working
code as possible to avoid disrupting everything else.

> yeah, so it slows down development of device drivers...big deal

And where patents are involved the slowdown will be for the
life of the patent - or until someone contributes it to the
public. 

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux