Historical accuracy (was: Re: FC4 or FC5)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Historical accuracy (was: Re: FC4 or FC5)
From: Joe Klemmer <klemmerj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 10:47:15 -0400
In-reply-to: <1150612429.2374.96.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:fedora-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:fedora-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BAYC1-PASMTP0933A9CF4F72E85AE26AE2AE830@xxxxxxx> <20060617015838.37546.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAYC1-PASMTP04B7B6DE4094BE180C3AC4AE800@xxxxxxx> <03b601c691be$ee1f24b0$0225a8c0@Wednesday> <1150521433.14925.25.camel@krs> <1150560117.12927.55.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150565726.2374.58.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150596226.13300.178.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150612429.2374.96.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 23:33 -0700, Craig White wrote:

> The simple fact is that Linux is GPL, has always been and will always
> be.

	Point of correction.  Linux version 0.01, 0.11 and, for a short time,
0.12 were not GPL'ed.  Linux became GPL licensed on, if I remember
right, February 1002.


-- 
Joe Klemmer <klemmerj@xxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Historical accuracy
  - From: Gene Heskett
- Re: Historical accuracy
  - From: Bill Polhemus
- Re: Historical accuracy (was: Re: FC4 or FC5)
  - From: Dave Ihnat

References:
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Sean
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: BRUCE STANLEY
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Sean
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: jdow
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Les Mikesell
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Craig White
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Les Mikesell
- Re: FC4 or FC5
  - From: Craig White

Prev by Date: Re: Intel PRO/Wireless 2200/2915 firmware on FC5
Next by Date: Re: Intel PRO/Wireless 2200/2915 firmware on FC5
Previous by thread: Re: FC4 or FC5
Next by thread: Re: Historical accuracy (was: Re: FC4 or FC5)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Older Fedora Users] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Package Announce] [EPEL Announce] [Fedora Magazine] [Fedora News] [Fedora Summer Coding] [Fedora Laptop] [Fedora Cloud] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Education] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Scitech] [Fedora Robotics] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Infrastructure] [Fedora Websites] [Anaconda Devel] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora Fonts] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Management Tools] [Fedora Mentors] [SSH] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora R Devel] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kickstart] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Fedora Legal] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora OCaml] [Coolkey] [Virtualization Tools] [ET Management Tools] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [Gnome Users] [KDE Users] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Asterisk PBX] [Fedora Sparc] [Fedora Universal Network Connector] [Libvirt Users] [Fedora ARM]