On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 22:20:08 +0100 "Jonathan Underwood" <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But, without getting into the reorganization of all the lists, it > seems that closing fedora-maintainers wasn't a point of contention - > is that correct? That being so, perhaps we should push this one step > forward, before chipping away at the rest of the big rock? I will be pushing this topic through FESCo tomorrow. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
