Re: mailinglists reorganization (was: Re: This list isn't working out. Or, why do we have fedora-devel and fedora-maintainers)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/09/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04.09.2007 22:18, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Di September 4 2007, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> >
> >> Apparently, asking this list was the wrong way to get things done.  How
> >> do we really do this?  Does this need to be proposed to some group?
> >> Does this need to come up for vote at some meeting?  How do we actually
> >> cut the life support here?
> >
> > Afaik should FESCO decision and knurd know more, because he proposed a
> > reorganization of the mailinglists a long time ago.
>
> Well, the last time was about six weeks ago on fab-list. But I stopped
> to work further on this (and told the board about it in private) after
> that because
>

[Thorsten's frustrations snipped]

Thorsten - I understand your frustrations after you've put so much
energy into coming up with a clear plan for the list organization only
to have it bounced around endlessly.

But, without getting into the reorganization of all the lists, it
seems that closing fedora-maintainers wasn't a point of contention -
is that correct? That being so, perhaps we should push this one step
forward, before chipping away at the rest of the big rock?

J.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux