On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 04:51:31PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 22:21 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > The same board decided shortly before that once there is another > > secondary arch besides ppc they would both be treated as such. > > I actually attended that meeting, and this is not what the board > decided. OK, someone please fix the recap then: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/Meetings/2007-06-12 > They decided to defer the question of where ppc would land until another > secondary arch was successfully implemented. Until then, it remains a > primary arch. "PPC will remain a primary architecture until <some requirements are fulfilled>" I read it differently, but whoever has the logs and is empowered to fix the summary should do so. In this case take my request to finalize this topic. Unless a relevant arch is tagged as secondary *before* there is a mechanism to deal with secondary archs there will never be a secondary arch mechanism, and if all archs save themselves into the primary arch boat that way, we'll live forever in a catch22, e.g. we'll only have primary archs support ot no support at all. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpW3DioE8I19.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
