On 16.07.2007 22:54, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 13:53 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
>>> Sure, but debuginfo-install works *without* changing the repo definition.
>>> So your upgrade will fail, as the newer version of XYZ won't upgrade because
>>> the debuginfo repo isn't active.
>> It would be kewl if yum told you "unhappy rpm comes from no repo in use".
+1 -- or better: for all conflicts/problems which lead yum to error out
name the packages involved, where they come from (by key used for
signing and/or %vendor, %distribution and %packager") and which are in
the available in the currently enabled repos.
> And when someone installs using rpm by hand? Sorry, keeping a separate
> database of this sort of information with yum is the path to misery.
Why is a separate database needed? Yum should have all the requires
informations already ("package-cleanup --orphans" at least is able to
show them and "yum list extras" as well IIRC)
CU
thl
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
