> Sure, but debuginfo-install works *without* changing the repo definition. > So your upgrade will fail, as the newer version of XYZ won't upgrade because > the debuginfo repo isn't active. It would be kewl if yum told you "unhappy rpm comes from no repo in use". I suppose you can't really tell now that if the sometimes the installed version of an updates rpm is no longer in the updates repo. The second suggestion is that yum et al store in some yum cache info somewhere which repo each install rpm came from. Then in various things it tells you about that rpm, it can mention which repo it came from and draw your attention to it being a disabled one if it is. Thanks, Roland -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
