On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 13:53 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Sure, but debuginfo-install works *without* changing the repo definition. > > So your upgrade will fail, as the newer version of XYZ won't upgrade because > > the debuginfo repo isn't active. > > It would be kewl if yum told you "unhappy rpm comes from no repo in use". > I suppose you can't really tell now that if the sometimes the installed > version of an updates rpm is no longer in the updates repo. The second > suggestion is that yum et al store in some yum cache info somewhere which > repo each install rpm came from. Then in various things it tells you about > that rpm, it can mention which repo it came from and draw your attention to > it being a disabled one if it is. And when someone installs using rpm by hand? Sorry, keeping a separate database of this sort of information with yum is the path to misery. Jeremy -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
