On 16.07.2007 15:39, Joel Andres Granados wrote: > > reference : BZ#246444 > > I have 1 of 2 choices: > [...] > Comments greatly appreciated. The better place for this questions is epel-devel-list (CCed and reply to set), where this has been discussed already in the past days and likely will get discussed further. It's also a topic for tomorrows EPEL SIG meeting (20070718, #fedora-meeting, 17:00 UTC). Join us ;-) BTW, I'd currently prefer to take the python-imaging from RHEL, lower the EVR (by using a "0." at the start of Release), and ship it in EPEL, so users of EL5Server have it available as well, and users of EL5Client or CentOS will get their normal package. Not ideal, but KISS and should work if nobody does stupid things. CU knurd P.S.: /me wonders if mailman will eat the follow-up to epel-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx P.P.S.:/me bets it will -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
