On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 00:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > At worst, > > someone from rel-eng can do it with a bit of proper research. I am > > prepared to do that as it seems to be the only way to solve this at the > > moment. > > So you are going to work around the maintainer if needed. Only because Ralf explicitly said he feels it's rel-eng's responsibility to fix it. I don't agree with that statement at all, but had he not said that I wouldn't touch the packages. > That's what I > wanted to know. Thanks. You're still going to hold the general policy discussion though, correct? Since that is indeed something that needs to be done in the long run. Or was all your posturing about that simply to get me to fix the current situation? josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
