On 15.05.2007 09:26, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2007 07:00:09 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>>> IMNSHO broken upgrades paths should be treated as release blockers. If >>>> package maintainers or others involved don't want to follow the process >>>> outlined and fix the packages, they should be pulled off before release. >>> Pulled off how? They are already broken... >> Pull off the repository for Fedora 7 release. Please consider upgrade >> paths as release blockers. > Avoid broken upgrade paths like the plague. They bear a big risk of > breaking Yum dist-upgrades, which in turn give burnt users a good > opportunity to bash Fedora. [...] Agreed, but that's a general problem, and not that specific to release time as the upgrade path against the released F7 might break soon after F7 was released anyway. Example: F7 release time has this in the repos: * F6 repo: foo-1.1-4.fc6.i386.rpm * F7 repo and on the media: foo-1.1-4.fc7.i386.rpm two weeks later foo got a update: * F6 repo: foo-1.1-6.fc6.i386.rpm * F7 repo: foo-1.1-6.fc7.i386.rpm The F7 isos of course still has foo-1.1-4.fc7.i386.rpm; so if someone has a full up2date F6-system two weeks after F7 got released and then does the upgrade from F6 to F7 with the media he won't get foo updated anyway. He'll get it with the first "yum update" after the dist upgrade. So we need to *always* make sure the upgrade path is proper, not only at release time. As such I think Rahul is shooting way over the top with pulling them from the repo, as that creates even more trouble for users. CU thl -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
