Re: Broken upgrade paths in F7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 23:12 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
As such I think Rahul is shooting way over the top with
pulling them from the repo, as that creates even more trouble for users.
Package is broken. Maintainer refuses to fix it. Others are not interested. Pulling the packages is the right way to go since they are implicitly orphaned packages. What alternative are you suggesting?

That's not quite true in this case.  The package isn't broken.  The tag
on which it sits is.  Just clarifying that.

Purely from the end user perspective what difference does it make? I don't think the implementation details change the gist of my argument. Maintainer politics shouldn't affect end users in a opaque way.

Rahul

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux