On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 20:05 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hans de Goede wrote: > > > >> If the fix is more invasive, then using updates-testing is fine > >> ofcourse, but for important, simple (obviously correct) fixes, I would > >> like to be able to skip updates-testing. > > > > Even "obviously correct" fixes have caused major regressions. Your > > packages would reach updates after sitting in updates-testing for a > > small amount of time. What's wrong with it? > > > > That small amount of time. There should be a balance between the chance for > regressions and the time spend in updates-testing. If the chance for > regressions is close to 0, the time spend in updates-testing should be 0. Since the tool isn't available yet I can't be sure, but I believe it's a manual push to -updates by the maintainer anyway. Theoretically and from a technical perspective, you could push it immediately. josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
