Re: Broken upgrade paths in F7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 00:14 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> > I suggested we wait a couple days.  Ralf has not officially declared his
> > packages to be orphaned.  I'm hoping he'll be amenable to perhaps
> > another maintainer submitting the tag request since he's taking a break
> > from Fedora.
> 
> That's all well and good for this specific instance but I am talking 
> more about a general policy. How are you going to handle instances where 
> maintainers refuse to cooperate? Step in and workaround them or consider 
> the packages orphaned and pull them off?

I have no energy to discuss some theoretical policy for a situation that
should hopefully not occur more than a few times.  I'm not saying you're
wrong to address that, however.  If you would like to have a discussion
on that, please start a new thread.  It's not a discussion or policy
that will be finalized before F7 releases.

josh

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux