On Wed, 16 May 2007 00:14:06 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >>> So we need to *always* make sure the upgrade path is proper, not only at > >>> release time. > >> > >> I think you missed out a part of what I said which was confined to the > >> release. The updates system should check for this and refuse to publish > >> if a sane update path doesn't exist from a previous release. > > > > That updates for dist N would have to wait for updates for dist N+1 would be > > unfortunate. > > Maintainers don't necessarily have to wait. They just need to fix it > simultaneously when they do an update. That is a bit more work but I > don't think that's unfortunate. I think you have misunderstood the fundamental problem. For a second try, all context is in above quotes. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
