On Tue, 15 May 2007 23:12:59 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > The F7 isos of course still has foo-1.1-4.fc7.i386.rpm; so if someone > > has a full up2date F6-system two weeks after F7 got released and then > > does the upgrade from F6 to F7 with the media he won't get foo updated > > anyway. He'll get it with the first "yum update" after the dist upgrade. > > > > So we need to *always* make sure the upgrade path is proper, not only at > > release time. > > I think you missed out a part of what I said which was confined to the > release. The updates system should check for this and refuse to publish > if a sane update path doesn't exist from a previous release. That updates for dist N would have to wait for updates for dist N+1 would be unfortunate. -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
