Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:34:25AM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> There's a lot of lower power devices which are still 32-bit only and are
> going to be for quite a while as far as I can see.  And being able to
> trivially build for them is one of the reasons why you go for x86 for
> them instead of an embedded specific chip like an arm or a mips.
> The compatibility and the fact that it's all but entirely transparent is
> a huge part of the value of the x86->x86_64 transition.

But couldn't we make a chrooted build environment near-transparent too? Then
it'd have those advantages on all architectures, *for* all architectures --
and for craziness like mingw32 -- without causing massive complexity for the
normal server or desktop case.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux