On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 12:12 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Well, anything that requires mono can probably piggyback on 238950, > as opposed to having its own separate one. That makes sense, as long as we can find the packages when we want to turn them on again (hell, I did firefox/ppc64 and that was as pointless as mono is). Having separate bugs which _depend_ on 238950 might be better. -- dwmw2 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
