On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 15:45 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > Egads. We had thought about this at one point, and it seems to have slipped > our collective minds. Many things will be able to build, but some thing that > require previously Extras packages in the buildroot will fail. I've setup a > tracker bug to track these. If your package fails to build, please file a > bug for it and block 'PPC64MissingDeps'. We will be trying to fix these > asap, by bootstrapping and rebuilding ex-Extras packages to generate a ppc64 > build of them. If at all possible, please do not ExcludeArch: ppc64. And if you do ExcludeArch: ppc64 remember that _ALL_ uses of ExcludeArch: must have a corresponding bug filed, even if it's just an explanation. And that bug must be on the corresponding ExcludeArch tracker bug. I've created the tracker bug (#238953) for ppc64 -- aliased 'FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64' for consistency with the others, which will all probably drop the leading 'FE-' from the name at some point. We _really_ ought to start enforcing this "ExcludeArch must have bug" rule in the build system. -- dwmw2 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
