On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:11:00PM +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: > >... I'd prefer bin32 > Oh, no!... > > /bin, /usr/bin, since the epoch... More precisely, I mean /bin, /usr/bin for the primary arch, and /bin32, /usr/bin32 for the secondary arch (32 bits) on x86_64. And the reverse on ppc, /bin, /usr/bin for 32 bits and /bin64, /usr/bin64 for the secondary arch. On ix86 /bin, /usr/bin only. To be even more precise I prefer that solution to bin64 for 64 bits and bin for 32 bits irrespective of the primary arch. One issue, though is that it is inconsistent with lib/lib64. -- Pat -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
