On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 11:21 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > It's called multiarch, not multibin. > > And that was the main problem with multilib and shortcut solutions: > multilib was the shortcut solution, and implied all the pain of the > last years. Not _all_ of the pain. A lot of the pain came from making stupid short-term decisions, like the filecolour hack in RPM which we're currently referring to. There was never any need for that, except perhaps as a short-term hack. Multilib _really_ doesn't need to be as painful as it has been in the past, if we start thinking about it a little more coherently. > Ditch multilib for good, go multiarch and forget about rpm special > handling, punched install/remove holes (that are firmly embedded in > the multilib design) and all the multilib pain. 'punched install/remove holes'? > It sounds like more changes/work than it actually is. I'm listening.... be specific. How does it work? -- dwmw2 -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
