On Thursday, 19 April 2007 at 17:52, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:05:14 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > Is gg2-devel "highly questionable packaging" as well? > > No, it isn't. Unlike a couple of other packages we've had before. > > I've said more than once (and everytime somebody has asked about the > multi-lib stuff) that as a last resort individual packages can be put onto > the multilib blacklist. > > I just don't want to be the target of flames and bad mood. There are much > nicer ways of how to request something. Fine. My apologies. I just don't know what to do now. repoclosure is telling me my package is broken and I see no way of fixing it, short of removing some functionality. > And we have a committee called > FESCo who are in charge of the Fedora multi-lib strategy. Would the FESCo please add gg2-(libs|devel) to the multilib exception list, then? Regards, R. -- Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
