On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 19:59 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > In that case can gnumeric please be blacklisted, and the i386 version removed > from the x86_64 repo? > > Thanks & regards, > > Hans Unfortunately, it's not that simple - gnumeric-devel is a proper subpackage of gnumeric, and as a good -devel subpackage, it properly requires its base package - which means you'll have gnumeric installed twice in a multilib setup, for each of these two arches. A potential way to ease this is to split out a -libs subpackage which contains the shared libraries (which are the things a -devel package really needs), then make both the base package and the -devel subpackage depend on it via a fully-versioned Requires tag. (See, for example, my recent split of the openbox packaging.) Then, gnumeric and gnumeric-devel would depend on gnumeric-libs, but you would have only one instance of gnumeric installed (for the parent arch). Hope that helps. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF & EFF Member GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ About: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
