broken deps outside of packagers control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

I just got this mail from the broken deps check script:

---

This is an automated mail created by an experimental script.
Your following packages in the repository contain broken dependencies:

======================================================================
The results in this report consider unreleased updates in the
build-system's needsign-queue!
======================================================================

package: gnumeric - 1:1.6.3-6.fc7.i386 from fedora-extras-development-x86_64
  unresolved deps:
     libperl.so

---

This raises 2 issues:
1 Notice how the deps are only broken for the i386 version in the x86_64 tree,
  this is something outside my control. If script XXX decides to put a i386
  gnumeric in the x86_64 tree, then the script should also make sure it puts in
  all need deps from the i386 tree

2 Why does the script put the i386 version of gnumeric (an application) in
  the x86_64 tree at all? That just doesn't make sense.

Regards,

Hans


--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux