On Thursday, 19 April 2007 at 10:22, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:39:10 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > No this sounds like a BAD solution to me. We are going to have this problem for > > every non noarch perl / python / ruby / xxx package that happens to split of a > > -devel package (for example because of .pc files). The proper solution is to > > either: > > 1) make the push script smarter > > 2) use a blacklist > > > > Also notice that gnumeric-devel is not a full devel package, it contains a .so > > symlink but no header files as libspreadsheet.so.xxx so far is intended for use > > by gnumeric only. Besides that it contains an .idl file. I've always been > > amazed about the split-off of a seperate devel package for these 2 files (1 > > symlink and file actually) but that is how I inhereted things from core. > > Highly questionable packaging, and with a brief look I also find > issues: Is gg2-devel "highly questionable packaging" as well? gg2-libs depends on libperl.so (for perl scripting support) and there's no way around it. I don't want to disable perl scripting support. Regards, R. -- Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski Livna contributor http://rpm.livna.org MPlayer developer http://mplayerhq.hu "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
