On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 11:33 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > Nicolas Mailhot wrote : > > > Le mercredi 11 avril 2007 à 00:29 +0200, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > > > > > US-ASCII is a meaningless term. There simply is no 8-bit ASCII > > > > Sure but ASCII is frequently abused nevertheless. And human lazyness > > will "help" people choose the abusive interpretation. > > How about referring to "plain ASCII" in the guideline? Why has no one mentioned the most obvious solution. Refer to it as "7-bit ASCII". It has the word "ASCII" in it for ease of understanding, and further stresses that we mean 7 bits, not 8. It may technically be redundant, but that's pretty much the point.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
