On Thursday 12 April 2007 01:50:39 pm Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Thursday 12 April 2007, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Just a couple of quick questions: > > While we don't feel comfortable with the build resources to move Core > > over to koji, we obviously have enough resources to build Extras. > > Hm, in terms of package numbers inside one arch, Extras devel is over twice > the size of Core devel. Just curious what makes Core's build resource > demands obviously higher than Extras'? More archs, more big packages to > build? more big packages. kernel, OOo, Eclipse, gcc, glibc things that take a long time to build and see semi frequent builds. > > What do you all think of this plan, or the idea in general of getting > > Extras to use Koji now, while we wait for more hardware to be able to > > merge in Core? > > Hard to say; what does moving to koji mean for the Joe Average packager, > and is there something in it that is required ASAP and plague doesn't do? > Without knowledge of such things, I tend to think making the move at the > same time for both and also making it possible for ex-Core packages to have > dependencies on ex-Extras ones also at the same time would sound quite > natural. Not enough info to have a strong opinion though. for average joe package they run the script to setup the koji environment that is in the koji package. they then run make build . on thing thats different is that koji shows you the progress on the console. you dont have to watch this if you dont want to but can follow a builds progress. -- Dennis Gilmore, RHCE -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
