Re: Role of SIG's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 22:22 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> But well, you brought that topic up. Quoting
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-January/msg00157.html
> 
> "[...]The Packaging Committee at the same time becomes a SIG. It will
> work as before;[...]FESCo in its meeting today agreed that this is the
> route it wants to take [...]Could the board please look at the proposal,
> discuss it in its tomorrows meeting and ACK it or if it dislikes parts
> give feedback if it wants to see something changed?"
> 
> The Board ACKed that afaik.

Heh, so we're a SIG, but we don't act like one, and we have special
powers. I think FPC is an ESIG. ;)

I don't really care what you call us, as long as you understand us.

~spot

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux