Tom "spot" Callaway schrieb: > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 11:09 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 21.03.2007 09:48, Trond Danielsen wrote: >>> 2007/3/20, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>> Ok. I am moving all of the Extras SIG's to /SIGs hierarchy. >> I'm late in the game, but I would have prefered to differentiate Fedora >> SIG and Packaging SIGs a bit more. Maybe >> SIGs/ for Fedora Sigs >> PackagingSGIs/ or SIGs/Packaging/ for Packaging SIGs >> But well, to late now probably. > > Packaging is not a SIG. We're extra special. :) I meant packaging the task in writing and maintaining spec files, not the Packaging Committee ;-) But well, you brought that topic up. Quoting https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2007-January/msg00157.html "[...]The Packaging Committee at the same time becomes a SIG. It will work as before;[...]FESCo in its meeting today agreed that this is the route it wants to take [...]Could the board please look at the proposal, discuss it in its tomorrows meeting and ACK it or if it dislikes parts give feedback if it wants to see something changed?" The Board ACKed that afaik. CU thl -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
